Everybody quotes from Bibles.

Which reduces the authors to the same standard of conversation as
transpires on this newsgroup.

Has nobody any confidence in what he is saying and feels in need of
support from the angeles.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Reg Edwards wrote:
Has nobody any confidence in what he is saying and feels in need of
support from the angeles.

"angeles"? Resorting to Spanish is no help. The present
question is, "can EZNEC be trusted"? We already know
your opinion. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Reg Edwards wrote:
Has nobody any confidence in what he is saying and feels in need
of
support from the angeles.

"angeles"? Resorting to Spanish is no help. The present
question is, "can EZNEC be trusted"? We already know
your opinion. :-)
========================================

Dear Cec,

- - - and what is my opinon which everybody is supposed to know?
C'mon then. Be truthful. Out with it!
----
Reg.

Reg Edwards wrote:
- - - and what is my opinon which everybody is supposed to know?
C'mon then. Be truthful. Out with it!

Your opinion of EZNEC is recorded for posterity on Google.
Who am I to embellish it?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Your opinion of EZNEC is recorded for posterity on Google.
Who am I to embellish it?
=========================
Cecil, as usual you are being hopelessly evasive.
----
Reg.

Reg Edwards wrote:

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Your opinion of EZNEC is recorded for posterity on Google.
Who am I to embellish it?

Cecil, as usual you are being hopelessly evasive.

I could waste my time Googling your opinion of EZNEC
but why should I waste my valuable time doing that?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:52:29 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
The present question is, "can EZNEC be trusted"?
This repugnant "question" borders on, and crosses into ignorance for
the sake of arguing.

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
The present question is, "can EZNEC be trusted"?

This repugnant "question" borders on, and crosses into ignorance for
the sake of arguing.

It was a rhetorical question, Richard. If the creator of EZNEC
disagrees with his own creation, what does that imply?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:35:40 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
The present question is, "can EZNEC be trusted"?

This repugnant "question" borders on, and crosses into ignorance for
the sake of arguing.

It was a rhetorical question

This prelude to more ignorance reveals moral equivocation.

Richard Clark wrote:
This prelude to more ignorance reveals moral equivocation.

Actually, your naivite' in following me down the primrose
path is enlightening.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp