Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: If, however, you look at the currents in and out of the *network* you'll see that they're different, because of current going to ground through the C. The main effect in a standing wave environment are the forward and reflected phasors rotating in opposite directions. The standing wave current is ZERO when those phasors are 180 degrees out of phase. The standing wave current is maximum when those phasors are in phase. "Current going to ground through the C" is not even required. That's utter nonsense Cecil, and why people aren't buying into your misconceived theories. Maybe you can take some time to rethink your position while on vacation. A two-terminal network that transforms impedance, now there's a concept! An inductor behaves exactly the same way in or out of your so-called standing wave environment. It follows the same rules all the time. Since your theory says otherwise, it has to be wrong. Wave theory is just another way of analyzing a complex system. It doesn't change how things inside the system behave. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |