Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K7ITM wrote: cascaded. Each was 1uH series, followed by 100pF shunt to ground. I put a 100 ohm load on one end and fed the other end with a 2.5MHz sine wave with 100 ohms source resistance. Sqrt(LC) is 10 nanoseconds per section, so I expect 100 nanoseconds total delay, or 90 degrees at 2.5MHz. That's what I saw. Then I added unity coupling among all the coils, and to keep the same net inductance, I decreased each inductor to 100nH. The result was STILL very close to a 90 degree phase shift, with a small loss in amplitude. In each case, the current in each successive inductor shifts phase by about 1/10 the total. Although the simulation is less than a perfect match to a completely distributed system with perfect flux linkage (and just how you do that I'm not quite sure anyway...), but it's close enough to convince me that perfect flux linkage would not prevent behaviour like a transmission line, given the requisite distributed capacitance. Thanks Tom, That's very interesting. My thought is the difference in phase-of-current at each of the inductor would be affected by mutual coupling, with perfect coupling preventing phase differences in current, but maybe that is shortsighted. I'll have to think about that a while and how it might affect what I am saying. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |