Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
The numbers you quote below have no relationship to the numbers from the model I sent you. This is the third time you have "accidentally" screwed with the model. It was no accident. Those numbers are from your model modified to an 8.5 ft. tall antenna. *Our original agreement was an 8 ft. tall antenna.* Your antenna was almost 50% longer, and that was a violation of the agreed upon boundary conditions. If you made it 50 feet tall the delay through the coil would be even smaller. I'll send you the modified files. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |