LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 31st 06, 07:49 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default Current through coils

Gene Fuller wrote:
The numbers you quote below have no relationship to the numbers from the
model I sent you. This is the third time you have "accidentally" screwed
with the model.


It was no accident. Those numbers are from your model modified
to an 8.5 ft. tall antenna. *Our original agreement was an 8 ft.
tall antenna.* Your antenna was almost 50% longer, and that was a
violation of the agreed upon boundary conditions. If you made
it 50 feet tall the delay through the coil would be even smaller.
I'll send you the modified files.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in Loading Coils Cecil Moore Antenna 2 March 5th 06 08:26 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter Stephen G. Gulyas Scanner 17 December 7th 04 06:42 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) Roy Lewallen Antenna 25 January 15th 04 09:11 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017