On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:24:05 -0400, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote:

If you stick wrong values in modeling program, the error will get only
magnified.
That's why this "bothers" me.

Hi Yuri,

This is a most ambiguous "bothering" in that you haven't put any
quantification to what the "error" leads to. No one can possibly
expect perfection, and ±20% is possibly the best accuracy most hams
can expect in measurement. We have all already identified that the
"error" stemmed from an inappropriate application of lumped inductance
in the place of a helix in modeling.

This begs the question: "What's all the fuss over? What's to be
proven? and How do we know when it has BEEN proven?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC