Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "What caused the rearward traveling current to go to zero?" The rearward-traveling current did not change phase on reflection from a load of too-few ohms. True, there is a re-reflection event exactly as you describe. But the reflection coefficient for that re-reflection event is not 1.0 so not all of the reflected power gets re-reflected. What happens to the rest of it? How do you explain the discrepancy between the physical reflection coefficient less than 1.0 and the apparent 100% re-reflection of reflected energy at a Z0-match point? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp "One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike ..." Guess who said that. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |