LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old July 12th 03, 09:28 PM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Harrison wrote:

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"What caused the rearward traveling current to go to zero?"

The rearward-traveling current did not change phase on reflection from a
load of too-few ohms.


True, there is a re-reflection event exactly as you describe. But the
reflection coefficient for that re-reflection event is not 1.0 so not
all of the reflected power gets re-reflected. What happens to the rest
of it? How do you explain the discrepancy between the physical reflection
coefficient less than 1.0 and the apparent 100% re-reflection of reflected
energy at a Z0-match point?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
"One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured
against reality, is primitive and childlike ..." Guess who said that.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017