LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old July 12th 03, 09:45 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm not sure if that's meant to be humorous, or if you really did
misinterpret what I meant. In case it's the latter, I'll amplify.

If a quarter wavelength shorted stub at frequency f1 has impedance R1,
then a quarter wavelength shorted stub at frequency f2 will have an
impedance of R1 * sqrt(f2 / f1), if it's made of the same type of
transmission line, and the frequency is in the range where conductor
loss dominates (below about 1 - 10 GHz for typical coax).

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

W5DXP wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

All else being equal, the impedance gets higher as frequency increases.



Double the frequency and you have a shorted 1/2WL stub. Isn't the
impedance of a shorted 1/2WL stub lower than the impedance of a
shorted 1/4WL stub?




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017