Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure if that's meant to be humorous, or if you really did
misinterpret what I meant. In case it's the latter, I'll amplify. If a quarter wavelength shorted stub at frequency f1 has impedance R1, then a quarter wavelength shorted stub at frequency f2 will have an impedance of R1 * sqrt(f2 / f1), if it's made of the same type of transmission line, and the frequency is in the range where conductor loss dominates (below about 1 - 10 GHz for typical coax). Roy Lewallen, W7EL W5DXP wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: All else being equal, the impedance gets higher as frequency increases. Double the frequency and you have a shorted 1/2WL stub. Isn't the impedance of a shorted 1/2WL stub lower than the impedance of a shorted 1/4WL stub? |