Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But what about comparing different ways of obtaining the same
inductance to find those with higher or lower Q? ====================================== To double Q, whatever it is, just double length and diameter of the coil, wind on a number of turns of much thicker wire for the same inductance, and Bingo, Q is doubled. The value of Q is unecessary. Efficiency and bandwidth can be deduced by calculating from the known values of wire and radiation resistances. But I suppose Q, once available, would be a short cut to crudely estimating bandwidth. Additional information is needed. The loss in the coil may not be the dominating factor. What matters is the System Q. It can be considerably worse than coil Q. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Self capacitance of solenoid coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
parallel transmission lines | Antenna |