Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old Ed wrote:
Reg, The type of antenna you describe is very useful and popular. However, your assertion is much too sweeping as a generalization. In no particular order, here are some caveats: 1. The qualifier "best" is largely meaningless, absent an agreed set of weighted criteria for "goodness." (How important is: size? weight? cost? visual profile? bandwidth? instant QSY? gain? pattern? low-band performance vs. high-band performance? power-handling capacity? need for tuner? etc., etc., etc.) I'm always hesitant to use words like "best" for all the reasons you state, but I think that Reg qualified things pretty well. Within the qualifications of all band dipoles, the ladder-line fed general dipole is pretty darn hard to beat. I recommend them to any new hams that ask me for advice on antennas. My rationale is that most new hams these days buy rigs that are all-band, transistorized units.These units are also sensitive to mismatches between antenna and rig. Most new hams are not antenna gurus either. So here is an antenna that will allow them to get on the air without a lot of fussing. The only real measurement caveats are some lengths that you don't want to use. So we end up with an antenna that allows the newbie to get on the air, allows them to learn some stuff by twiddling knobs and such, then when they have a bit more experience, they can tackle that more "advanced antenna" with it's more exacting design, trimming , and measurements. 2. A good case can be made that choosing the "right" length is "better" than a random length, within this type. 3. An excellent case can be made that center-fed is NOT always the "best" option, within this type. 4. I'll let the fans of this antenna type chime in with why they prefer balanced tuners and/or tuned feeders to the use of an unbalanced tuner... if they want to. (I use more tailored antennas, and don't need a tuner of any kind, most of the time.) As I do now. I've really been smitten with my OCF dipole, fed with Coax, because in no small part, the feedpoint drops straight down to my shack. That coupled with an automatic tuner in my radio , allowing me to "plug and play. But I still strongly urge newcomers to put up one of those ladder line dipoles for the experience. They work okay, too! 8^) "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... The best, all round, all band, antenna is a high centre-fed dipole of no particular length, fed with an open-wire feedline of no particular length or impedance, all the way to the shack, used with a choke-balun and an unbalanced tuner. It is good down to the frequency at which the dipole is about 1/3-wavelength long. Simplicity = efficiency. Once tried you will never return to anything else. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hams attempt to destroy GMRS! | Policy | |||
Hams attempt to destroy GMRS! | Policy | |||
World record attempt | Broadcasting | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
First attempt at an all-news or an "all-news-and-talk" station in Canada? | Broadcasting |