Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 06:11:10 GMT, Robert Casey
wrote: Our rigs actually present a very low impedance to the antenna and transmission line. This is by design; we want all of the RF we manufactured to go to the antenna and none wasted as heat in the rig. Our rigs don't really look like the Thevinian equivalent (voltage source with internal resistor of 50 ohms) feeding a 50 ohm load. Hi Robert, Actually none of this is true. It is the glib explanation that is bandied about commonly in this forum, but it contains its own internal inconsistency of logic. This illogic is present in the single statement: Reflected power will "bounce" off the rig and go back to the antenna. The presumption is that the point of bouncing back, the transistion point of the so-called low Z transmitter to the high Z line, performs this action. It contains to howlers: 1. if it were true, no one would ever need a tuner whose sole purpose is to do exactly that (the bouncing back); 2. if it were true, the original power coming from the transmitter would see the same reflection and bounce right back in to turn to heat (which is a fairly true representation of the problem of SWR). As for the reality of the situation, answer me this: 1. How much power does your rig transmit? 2. How much power does your rig draw? Correct me if the operation of dividing the first by the second does not reveal an efficiency of roughly 40% and a power loss to heat of roughly greater than that transmitted. Your rig has a massive heat sink with a fan, n'est pas? Too many of the pundits want to force a literal carbon composition resistor into the mix so that they can point to its absence proving Thevenin's Theorem does not apply. The same pundits ignore the fact that Thevenin did not specify a resistor, he specified an impedance to satisfy his theorem. It was Edison's pervsion of logic in trying to persuade the investors that AC distribution was for the birds when it came time to match loads. He inserted the false claim of resistance forcing inefficiency. This perversion has been with us ever since and qualifies such believers only as possible investors in the Edison DC Power distribution company (which folded immediately due to inefficiency in the market place). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |