Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 06, 09:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default which is best?

RB wrote:
If we get rid of cloud warming angles of elevation, I guess we're left with
NVIS. I think that's what I would call a useful direction.


NVIS *IS* cloud warming angles of elevation. Those are the
ones I prefer for my type of operation. Who wants to talk
to strangers who don't speak Texan? :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 06, 11:06 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
RB
 
Posts: n/a
Default which is best?

Well, I'm still getting tripped up in my terms. Not doing too well, here.

What I'm looking for is max low angle radiation comparison of the two.


  #3   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 06, 11:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default which is best?

"RB" wrote in message
...
Well, I'm still getting tripped up in my terms. Not doing too well, here.

What I'm looking for is max low angle radiation comparison of the two.


The vertical, should have a far better low angle performance, although
four radials is probably inadequate to minimize ground absorbtion.

The inclusion of a loading coil does little or nothing to effect the
radiation
efficiency.

Frank


  #4   Report Post  
Old March 24th 06, 08:23 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Michael Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default which is best?

Frank wrote:
"RB" wrote in message
...
Well, I'm still getting tripped up in my terms. Not doing too well, here.

What I'm looking for is max low angle radiation comparison of the two.


The vertical, should have a far better low angle performance, although
four radials is probably inadequate to minimize ground absorbtion.


Better to s that the vertical will put out more of it's energy at low
angles. That makes a difference.

Another thing to consider is that the vertical will take a whole lot
longer to install than the dipole. Those radials can be a real pain in
the back!

The way my thinking has been shifting recently, I would suggest that
people - a lot of people - think of the radiation pattern of an antenna
as some sort of narrow blob that shoots off the thing at the "maximum
angle". Trouble is, all antennas radiate at all angles. Some just better
than others. Before condemning a dipole as not usable for DX because of
its radiation angle, we should probably compare it to the angle of that
vertical. Then look at just how many db difference there is between the
two (all else being equal).

And of course, as I have been finding out, which one does best
at any given moment (let's define best as the highest signal level at
the receiver) is going to change from moment to moment. I haven't gone
to transmitting differences yet


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

The inclusion of a loading coil does little or nothing to effect the
radiation efficiency.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017