Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
According to ON4UN - linear loading can be made virtually loss free (pg 9-39). Can't do that with coils. Why not? You can get less ohmic losses from less wire (tubing) in the coil than from the stub. We just went through long argument about current in the loading coils. People that replaced loading stubs with loading coils in say KLM 3 el. 80m antennas, found better efficiency and improvement on the pattern. Reality, not a "calculated truth" :-) Yep, completely understandable since the resistance of a coil goes up proportional to the number of turns and the inductance of a coil goes up (nearly) proportional to the square of the number of turns. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Load matching puzzle | Antenna |