On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:50:32 -0500, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote:

Let's start the fresh thread and trace step by step where I went wrong.

Hi Yuri,

Are you then abandoning your web page?

You know, it would seem to be better effort to stick with the
demonstrables there and to make sense of them, than to wander the
intellectual landscape of "theory."

OK lets get me some educating here.
I understand that, say quarter wave resonant vertical (say 33 ft at 40m) has
90 electrical degrees.
Is that right or wrong?

If you cannot define your limits of error, then Cecil is bound to do
it for you and plug in +/- 50% to make any assertion laughable, such
as:

Can we describe "pieces" or segments of the radiator as having proportional
amount of degrees corresponding to their physical length, when excited with
particular frequency?

You've left too many things out to agree to more than a rather
insubstantial maybe. If that's sufficient, then there's really no
need to go any further, is there?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC