Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Awww, MAN,Cecil. I am sorry. I had no idea that you were putting up
with a newsreader that can't follow threads, and in addition you have such a severe short term memory loss that you can't follow what's been posted within the past couple hours. Bummer, man. Real bummer. I feel for you. It's a really bad combination. We should be able to help you out with the newsreader problem if you want. I'm not so sure about the memory loss thing, though. It might help if you didn't try to keep so many balls in the air all at once, but I don't know that for certain. I've patched together below (from the newsreader I use, which does keep track of all the branches of threads) what I wrote and what I was replying to in this particular sub-thread, so you can see it all in one place. If you'd like, I could do the same with the postings from other sub-threads here and from that other thread-that-wouldn't-die and email it to you, but that would be on a time-permitting basis. Cheers, Tom ------------------- ------------------- The above is in reply to: ------------------- Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.c om!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com !newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b .news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prod igy.com!newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!00eff025 !not-for-mail From: Cecil Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna Subject: Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch References: . com .com t .com In-Reply-To: .com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.149.30.33 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: newssvr25.news.prodigy.net 1144183841 ST000 64.149.30.33 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:50:41 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:50:41 EDT Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: [[PA@SZG@@WCC^H]]RKB_UDAZZ\DPCPDLXUNNHDK@YUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFD SSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:50:41 GMT K7ITM wrote: You really think so, Cecil?? I saw through it the first time you posted it. As an EZNEC and NEC2 user, I know that not only the current magnitude, but also its phase, is reported. I knew that what you posted about it was incorrect. I don't see Roy's comment as agreeing with you at all, but completely disagreeing. You said that it only gave amplitude information, when in fact it gives phase and amplitude. Again, no quote from me. I have no idea to what you are responding or even if you are responding to something I said today or last year. I didn't say EZNEC doesn't give phase information. I said there is no phase information in the phase information that EXNEC gives. What is it about Gene's posting that you don't understand? Regarding the cos(kz)*cos(wt) term in a standing wave: Gene Fuller, W4SZ wrote: In a standing wave antenna problem, such as the one you describe, there is no remaining phase information. Any specific phase characteristics of the traveling waves died out when the startup transients died out. Phase is gone. Kaput. Vanished. Cannot be recovered. Never to be seen again. The only "phase" remaining is the cos (kz) term, which is really an amplitude description, not a phase. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ------------------------------- ------------------------------- which was in reply to my message: ------------------------------- Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "K7ITM" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna Subject: Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch Date: 4 Apr 2006 13:26:07 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 7 Message-ID: .com References: . com .com t NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.25.142.225 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1144182372 31795 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2006 20:26:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.25.142.225; posting-account=phdUIAwAAABBVjeZzACGtATOLRtXatU- You really think so, Cecil?? I saw through it the first time you posted it. As an EZNEC and NEC2 user, I know that not only the current magnitude, but also its phase, is reported. I knew that what you posted about it was incorrect. I don't see Roy's comment as agreeing with you at all, but completely disagreeing. You said that it only gave amplitude information, when in fact it gives phase and amplitude. ------------------------------- ------------------------------- which was in reply to Cecil's message: ------------------------------- Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.c om!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodi gy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!pos tmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr25.news.prodigy.ne t.POSTED!00eff025!not-for-mail From: Cecil Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna Subject: Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch References: . com .com t In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 15 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.149.30.33 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: newssvr25.news.prodigy.net 1144179596 ST000 64.149.30.33 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:39:56 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:39:56 EDT Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: OP\YG\GFEB^UCWDYIBHZOWP@YZOZ@GXOXJXNMRQIMASJETAANV W[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:39:56 GMT Roy Lewallen wrote: I see that Cecil's latest fetish is that EZNEC reports RMS values of voltage and current. Because we know that the voltages and currents are purely sinusoidal, the RMS value and phase angle (also reported by EZNEC) are adequate to define the time waveform. That is, when we know the RMS amplitude and the phase angle, we know the value of the waveform at every instant in time. No additional information is necessary. Since you agree with me, what's with the fetish remark? You seem to feel obliged to take an ad hominem pot shot every time you mention my name. I assure you, it is hurting your reputation more than it is hurting mine. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ------------------------------- ------------------------------- By implication, this is also with respect to what Cecil wrote at the end of another subthread. The in-reply-to-s can be used to trace things back...: ------------------------------- Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.c om!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com !newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b .news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prod igy.com!newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!00eff025 !not-for-mail From: Cecil Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna Subject: Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch References: . com .com .com om t . com .com In-Reply-To: .com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 30 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.149.30.33 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: newssvr25.news.prodigy.net 1144181906 ST000 64.149.30.33 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:18:26 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:18:26 EDT Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: OP\YG\GFEB^UCWDYIBHZOWP@YZOZ@GXOXJXNMRQIMASJETAANV W[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:18:26 GMT K7ITM wrote: I beg your pardon? Excuse me? I "trimmed out all the technical content and didn't quote anything you said"??? Yes, and you are doing it again. I'm quoting your entire posting and there is not one quote from me. As a matter of fact, I took exactly the numbers you gave us, ALL of them, and used them and ONLY them in my accounting. If THAT's "disembodied from reality," then I'd point out that it's YOUR numbers that are disembodied from reality. In fact, I didn't argue with YOUR numbers at all. I just took them at face value. You were the one that discarded what I carefully developed from them without out so much as an ounce of reasoning or explanation. After that I went on to FURTHER EXPLAIN why I had done what I did in the first place, and you dismissed that again without any technical explanation. It's all there for everyone to see, Cecil. If there's a quote from me in this posting, Tom, I am unable to find it. Go ahead, dig yourself deeper into it. Since you didn't quote anything I said, I have no idea what you are talking about. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ------------------------------- ------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |