Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Apr 2006 21:05:43 -0700, "K7ITM" wrote:
Do you disagree that resonance of a monopole over a ground plane is for a length somewhat shorter than c/(4*f(resonance))? If you do, then let's have a discussion about THAT. Hi Tom, Do I disagree? Now, there's a classic line that too frequently litters these threads. I've offered many antennas that are spectacularly (considering their commercial application) shorter than quarterwave (the same size, and longer too). These shorter antennas easily embody your comment above. Now what is the THAT that seems to bear discussing that I haven't already covered twice? Three times is not a charm. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |