Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Based entirely on what you yourself have written, I have told you that
you don't understand something.

Unless you can prove you are omniscient, Ian, the problem could
possibly be with your misunderstanding of something, not mine.

% along current in current in
wire #2 TravWave.EZ StndWave.EZ

0.28% 0.9998 at -0.99 deg 0.9996 at 0 deg
9.72% 0.9983 at -9.39 deg 0.9843 at -0.03 deg
19.7% 0.9969 at -18.23 deg 0.9454 at -0.05 deg
30.3% 0.9957 at -27.59 deg 0.8843 at -0.06 deg
39.7% 0.9949 at -35.96 deg 0.8023 at -0.08 deg
49.7% 0.9945 at -44.84 deg 0.7014 at -0.09 deg
60.3% 0.9945 at -54.20 deg 0.5840 at -0.09 deg
69.7% 0.9949 at -62.58 deg 0.4528 at -0.10 deg
79.7% 0.9956 at -71.43 deg 0.3110 at -0.11 deg
89.7% 0.9965 at -80.27 deg 0.1616 at -0.11 deg
99.7% 0.9976 at -89.14 deg 0.0061 at -0.11 deg

My EZNEC data posting proves that EZNEC correctly predicts the
differences in the traveling wave current and the standing wave
current. I'm building a new web page around those results. I have
graphed the EZNEC results and they are available at:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/travstnd.GIF

Please note that the traveling wave magnitude looks like the
standing wave phase and the traveling wave phase looks like the
standing wave magnitude. Anyone who maintains that there is no
difference between a traveling wave current and a standing wave
current should take a long close look.

The corresponding EZNEC files are available at:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/TravWave.EZ
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/StndWave.EZ
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp