On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:12:29 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Yes, that way I am the owner of the thought, unlike other
people who like to engage in mind fornication using
someone else's mind.

Glad to hear you only use your own mind for that.

So your religion practices Onanism?

Richard Clark wrote:
Glad to hear you only use your own mind for that.

So your religion practices Onanism?

It means that if I decide to mentally masturbate, I'll use my
own mind, thank you, not someone else's mind, as do a lot of
the posters on this newsgroup.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:53:07 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
So your religion practices Onanism?

It means that if I decide to mentally masturbate, I'll use my
own mind, thank you, not someone else's mind, as do a lot of
the posters on this newsgroup.

Lot of bafflegab in that. I will take it to mean yes.

Richard Clark wrote:
Lot of bafflegab in that. I will take it to mean yes.

Whatever way you choose to "take it" has absolutely no
effect on any reality except your own personal reality
existing only in your head. Enjoy!
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:57:55 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Whatever way you choose to "take it" has absolutely no
effect on any reality except your own personal reality
existing only in your head. Enjoy!

Odd you chose to deviate from technical discussion to explain
"seeming" in terms of fornication and masturbation. You offer no
quantifiables, and even more oddly, no qualifiables. Yours would be a
pretty strange reality.

Richard Clark wrote:
Odd you chose to deviate from technical discussion to explain
"seeming" in terms of fornication and masturbation. You offer no
quantifiables, ...

Suffice it to say that at my age, the quantifiables are not
what they used to be. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp