Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote: So you think adding turns to a coil is a nice linear process that allows you to then subdivide the resonance effects according the number of turns in each subsection? That appears to me to be the most valid measurement that we can make of the delay through a coil. If you have a better way, please present it. Cecil, C'mon, you know as well as anybody that inductance of a coil tends to increase as n-squared. Yes, there are all kinds of special cases and correction factors. Adding turns and then pretending everything is nice and linear, thereby allowing decomposition into subcomponents, is just plain silly. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |