Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Increasing the length of a coil or transmission line doesn't change its velocity factor at a fixed frequency. That is an interesting hypothesis. Since I know you are going to nit-pick that statement, I probably should add "appreciably" in front of "change". :-) How would you go about testing its validity? The velocity factor of a piece of transmission line doesn't change appreciably with length. The velocity factor of a straight wire doesn't change appreciably with length. I would think that a two wavelength coil would be approximately twice as long as a one wavelength coil which would be approximately twice as long as a 1/2 wavelength coil. The equation for the velocity factor of a coil depends upon: 1. The diameter of the coil 2. The number of turns per unit length 3. The frequency None of those factors are dependent upon the length of the coil. (Have you heard of end effects?) Of course, it's the 5% difference between 468/f and 492/f. I'm not talking super accuracy here - just better accuracy than anyone has yet measured. It is akin to your suggestion that a coil be installed between two current nodes and its number of degrees calculated from that. I will try to take that same coil that I have been talking about and use your suggestion to see how close the results are. However, I am preparing for a 6 state Harley road trip over the Easter holidays and will not be back until Monday. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |