"Richard Clark" wrote:

w5dxp wrote:
Of course it is shown. Draw a vertical line at 10^-3.
The 10k turns per lamda coil
That is for coil A
has a VF of 0.07.

The 50 turns per lamda
That is for coil B
has a VF of 0.86.
Well, in fact it does not (and nothing shown on the graph along that
ordinal line does).

What happened should be obvious. I correctly used the 10^-3
vertical line for the first one and accidentally used the 0.01 vertical
line for the second one.

The first observation is OK. The second should be changed to
500 turns per lamda with a VF of 0.96.

The same principle still applies. As the turns/lamda increases,
the VF decreases while keeping the diameter and frequency
the same.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:46:09 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:

What happened should be obvious.

You played the pity card. It was so obvious that I forecast that
immediately.

The second should be changed to 500 turns per lamda with a VF of 0.96.

Only 1000% off on the turns count - not bad for the first step in a
reading comprehension test. Further interpretations suffer equally.