LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old December 15th 03, 10:54 PM
Ralph Mowery
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Consider TV coverage, UHF channels versus VHF channels. The difference
in coverage is small..

In the good old days, increasing the frequency often meant decreasing
equipment performance. Solutions have now been found to many UHF
equipment problems.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


Not sure about the TV stations but I was thinking they can run more ERP than
the VHF stations.

In the 'good old days' it was difficult to build a receiver that was as
sensitive at 440 as it was at 150 mhz and power was harder to generate also.
With solid state there is very little differance in the devices sensitivity
up to atleast 1ghz and maybe higher than it is at 30 mhz. Power in the
range of 100 watts is easy in the solid state units also now.
For the last few years it seems that many ham rigs have about 35 watts on
440 and 50 watts on 2 meters. Mainly in solid state gain blocks. Not that
much differance .




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM
Cell & VHF/UHF antenna suggestions for fiberglass RVAntenna Dunc Antenna 11 November 19th 03 11:48 PM
Colinear vhf/uhf from QST Mogens Antenna 0 October 1st 03 02:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017