Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
(snip) If you simply want to know why he uttered John, yes you would. But you would not have the choke. The ferrite is wholly transparent to the differential currents (the balanced and thus equally opposing line currents). Its presence or absences is immaterial. This is the abstraction of Reggie's bafflegab for instead simply saying you don't need a choke (the lines' balance proves that). Now, if that condition of balance were to ever go away (like we leave that comfortable illusion and return to reality), then the absence of the ferrite has also rendered your "choke" chokeless (by the degree of its contribution because in spite of Reggie's claim, the turns of your coil remains a choke, if only an inadequate one). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hi, Richard - Although your language is a bit formal for me (I lack a formal education), I think I understand what your are saying. I am aware that the fields caused by the differential currents cancel (mostly). It makes sense that a magnetic core is not necessary when the fields cancel. And, I can see where the core is useful when the fields do not cancel. I just did not interpret Reg's information as applying to one situation and not the other. Thank you and 73. John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A choke balun is an impedance transformer. | Antenna | |||
How do I test a choke balun? | Antenna | |||
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? | Antenna | |||
NEW - Choke Balun Program | Antenna | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave |