Roy Lewallen wrote:
Frank's wrote:

I think the EH is the same idea as the CFA; in which case the following
paper
says it all: http://www.fi.uba.ar/materias/6654/d...CFAantenna.pdf.

It is hard to imagine going to these lengths to debunk nonsense, but I guess
it is the only way.

And, as we periodically see here, even going to these lengths aren't
completely adequate.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

That's because the EH antenna and the CFA antenna are based on a
religion or faith, not on science.

No matter what facts multiple independent sources submit, those who
have faith will ignore the facts.

73 Tom