Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not if you are in the business of spying! grin It takes a machine that
can penetrate or couple to the fiber without damaging its throughput (much). I mean given that fiber splicing uses a pretty expensive machine itself I doubt am eavesdropping device would be much harder to manufacture... Your next big expense is to sort through the reams of data that pass through the link! Do you see it as being viable for amateur radio hobbyists or was your post for general technical interest only? Perhaps I am missing some possibilities here.. Cheers Bob Marco Licetti wrote: OK. Just one comment: intercepting fiberoptics is more complicated/costly than metal "wires" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Massachusetts. Cambridge. Community access television. | Broadcasting |