Tom Donaly wrote:
You sure use a lot of words to signify the fact that you're
sunk, Cecil, and don't have a clue.

The technical content of your posting is duely noted, Tom,
for all the world to observe. Do you really believe that
such an ad hominem gut feeling statement has any impact or
technical value at all? (Rhetorical question)

It reminds me of what an eight year old would say.

If you really want to make a technical impact, please
respond to my tabular data table concerning EZNEC traveling
wave current values Vs standing wave current values.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

You sure use a lot of words to signify the fact that you're
sunk, Cecil, and don't have a clue.


The technical content of your posting is duely noted, Tom,
for all the world to observe. Do you really believe that
such an ad hominem gut feeling statement has any impact or
technical value at all? (Rhetorical question)

It reminds me of what an eight year old would say.

If you really want to make a technical impact, please
respond to my tabular data table concerning EZNEC traveling
wave current values Vs standing wave current values.

Cecil, you've proven over and over again that you're not
interested in technical discussion. You are interested in
argument and a crude sort of digladiation where you do the
verbal equivalent of kicking, biting, hitting below the belt,
rabbit and sucker punching, throwing sand, popping
steroids and amphetamines,and shooting people in the back.
All this is being duly noted by the participants who by
now have consigned your theories to the fractal junk pile.
Come back when you're really interested in a technical
discussion. The kind of discourse you enjoy is only fit
for ending marriages.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil, you've proven over and over again that you're not
interested in technical discussion.

Allow me to disprove your opinion of me. Please respond to
this earlier posting of mine:

The testx.EZ file has been renamed to:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/TravWave.EZ

The testy.EZ file has been renamed to:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/StndWave.EZ

The current reported by EZNEC for TravWave.EZ contains the term
cos(kz+wt) It's a traveling wave current, clearly not the same
as a standing wave current.

The current reported by EZNEC for StndWave.EZ contains the terms
cos(kz)*cos(wt) It's a standing wave current, clearly not the
same as a traveling wave current.

Current reported by EZNEC every 10% of wire #2 is presented in
the following table. The currents are obviously very different.
The phase of the traveling wave progresses from 0 to 90 deg
in 90 deg of wire. The phase of the standing wave doesn't
progress beyond 0.11 of of degree.

% along current in current in
wire #2 TravWave.EZ StndWave.EZ

0% 0.9998 at -0.99 deg 0.9996 at 0 deg
10% 0.9983 at -9.39 deg 0.9843 at -0.03 deg
20% 0.9969 at -18.23 deg 0.9454 at -0.05 deg
30% 0.9957 at -27.59 deg 0.8843 at -0.06 deg
40% 0.9949 at -35.96 deg 0.8023 at -0.08 deg
50% 0.9945 at -44.84 deg 0.7014 at -0.09 deg
60% 0.9945 at -54.20 deg 0.5840 at -0.09 deg
70% 0.9949 at -62.58 deg 0.4528 at -0.10 deg
80% 0.9956 at -71.43 deg 0.3110 at -0.11 deg
90% 0.9965 at -80.27 deg 0.1616 at -0.11 deg
100% 0.9976 at -89.14 deg 0.0061 at -0.11 deg

Some say "current is current". EZNEC disagrees. When
reflected waves are eliminated, EZNEC indeed does accurately
report traveling wave current. EZNEC reports the current
that is there, whether it is traveling wave current or
standing wave current.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp