Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:41:36 +0100, "Reg Edwards"
wrote: You dim witts are calculating Q incorrectly. Reg, that is just so polite! Q = X / R where R is the RF resistance of the conductor and X is the reactance of the conductor's inductance. You first have to calculate inductance. So, you state that the ratio X/R is an acceptable way to express the Q of an inductor, why is it unacceptable to express the Q of a two terminal device with an equivalent series impedance of 0.88+j50 (where 0.88 is the RF series resistance of the network and 50 is the series inductive reactance of the element) as 50/0.88 or 57? Aren't the effiency implications (for that was the context) for a 50 ohm reactance created with a TL stub as described just the same as for a coil with 50 ohms of inductive reactance and 0.88 ohms of series (RF) resistance, ie a coil with the same Q factor? Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
Top Loading Butternut HF2V for 160m | Antenna | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Loop antenna question | Shortwave | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |