On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:47 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:


You have answered NONE of these questions. Or was it just one, 92
inches tall? You couldn't even get that one right because the picture
ON YOUR PAGE obviously showed a bigger one!

You apparently think you can treat us like fools and that this is
enough to prove:


What's next? Denying that there is a daylight, when the sun is out?


Yuri, you don't have the horsepower to win the race of wits.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

If he will just post the plans to duplicate the antenna, it would give
the rest of us something to test. That would be way too easy, I guess.

Hi Tom,

If the mood strikes me, I will see how much effort it takes to blow
away his "efficient" antenna. Seeing how he has no answers for its
construction, I can easily impose my own choices like an high E piano
string radiator mid loaded with a squirrel cage over a radial field of
rusting springs from a burnt-out mattress. There should be room for
improvement over that using a coat hanger with distributed loads of
barn nails over the roof of a 1948 Hudson.

Hi Dave,

You never answered:
"What's your point?"
but are you having fun with loading yet?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC