| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Tom Donaly wrote: How do you know it's a "pure cosine wave," Cecil? Because Kraus says so? That's interesting. It means we don't need to use NEC any more. As I said previously, it's only a pure cosine wave for a thin-wire dipole. NEC handles more than thin-wire dipoles. The coil adds a bulge to the thin-wire cosine wave but the overall envelope is clearly visible. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
| Top Loading Butternut HF2V for 160m | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
| Loop antenna question | Shortwave | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||