![]() |
60 meter ERP
Edward Lewis wrote:
I just read the QST article on 60 meters and I have some questions. The FCC said that 50 watts ERP is allowed and a half wave dipole will be presumed to have a gain of 0 dBd. iI don,t think most hams will put up a dipole for 60 , but will use existing antennas such as 30 40 or 80 meter dipoles.how would you calculate the ERP for these antennas to be in compliance with the FCC. I suspect the FCC would be satisfied with EZNEC modeling results. Give him four uninterrupted hours, and Reg will have a software package for it. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reg has had that software on his site for years. It is called Dipole3.exe.
That is what I used to document my antenna for 60 meters. KA9CAR "W5DXP" wrote in message ... Edward Lewis wrote: I just read the QST article on 60 meters and I have some questions. The FCC said that 50 watts ERP is allowed and a half wave dipole will be presumed to have a gain of 0 dBd. iI don,t think most hams will put up a dipole for 60 , but will use existing antennas such as 30 40 or 80 meter dipoles.how would you calculate the ERP for these antennas to be in compliance with the FCC. I suspect the FCC would be satisfied with EZNEC modeling results. Give him four uninterrupted hours, and Reg will have a software package for it. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com