LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old April 21st 06, 01:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John Ferrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default EZNEC Vertical interpretation

Thank you, I get that!
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:12:20 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote:



The loss is due solely to the inductor's resistance -- you'll get the
same result by replacing the inductor with a 3 ohm resistor. The amount
of gain reduction due to the inductor will get worse and worse as the
antenna gets shorter and shorter, for two reasons. The first is that the
antenna's radiation resistance drops as it gets shorter, so the inductor
loss becomes a greater fraction of the total feedpoint resistance. The
second is that you need a larger inductor for a shorter antenna and,
assuming a constant Q, that means more inductor resistance.

. . .


Roy Lewallen, W7EL

John Ferrell W8CCW
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
help with EZNEC and a parasitic vertical antenna Rob Brown Antenna 0 October 13th 05 12:27 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? Kristinn Andersen Antenna 23 August 8th 03 11:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017