Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Crew:
What may have been lost in this discussion - but often provided by Roy - is the difference between a true surface wave and a sky wave (from the same vertical antenna). An excellent ground screen at the base of a vertical antenna reduces the losses and thus increases the amplitude of both the surface and sky wave. A few to several hundred wavelengths from the vertical antenna, the amplitude of the received surface wave is highly dependent on the conductivity of the intervening earth. One could hedge this a bit for frequencies above something like 5 MHz. At distances from the antenna where the surface wave has become weak, the sky wave dominates. As Roy has pointed out several times: the amplitude of the sky wave is mostly determined by ground properties distant from the antenna - much farther away than any reasonable ground screen will extend. The sky wave effect may be demonstrated in NEC by effecting a 0.25 WL vertical with a good set of radials over mediocre ground and then changing the ground, at some distance from the antenna, to salt water. (Visualize the antenna being in the center of a circular island and change the diameter of the island.) Broadcasters at MF, with some exceptions, are interested in maximum surface wave and minimum sky wave. Radio amateurs, for the most part, are interested in maximizing the sky wave. A good radial system assists the radio amateur's goal by improving the overall efficiency. It is the ground distant from the vertical antenna that determines the sky wave. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil Moore" wrote in news:JbR1g.62010$F_3.14225
@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net: "John Ferrell" wrote: I don't find the Helix feature in my copy of EZNEC+ V4. I believe I can get the same results by inserting an appropriate load. It will just be a little more cumbersome. The helix feature is found under the Wires window under the create menu. But it is somewhat complicated. A lumped inductance load will get you started. The problem with feeding an impedance of 1.2-j1400 ohms is getting power into the antenna without dissipating most of it in the matching network. A funny anecdote comes to mind in this connection. I was trying desperately to load a very short helical dipole on 40M and ended up hooking it to my old Dentron 1KW matchbox to see if that could do anything with it. Damn antenna loaded up perfectly. SWR at on the line to the matchbox 1.1 to 1, good power transfer at 25 watts from the exciter. So I went to listen with it. NOTHING! NADA! Not even a dit, even though the big vertical array just hummed with CW signals on the band. So I leaned over to check connections and darn near fried my hand on the case of the Dentron. THAT'S where all the watts were going. Damn tuner was loading its own case! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 VA7CZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|