Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Roy, W7EL wrote: "What is the velocity factor, and how did you calculate it?" Given: length = 12 inches diamwter = 6 in. L = 38.6 microhenry I used formula (37) from Terman`s Handbook to calculate 25 turns in the coil. 471 inches of wire are needed in the coil. The velocity of the EM wave traveling around the turns of the coil is almost equal to the velocity in a straight wire. But, the time required to travel 471 inches is 40 times the time required to travel 12 inches. The velocity factor is the reciprocal of 40 or 0.025. Not quite what I was expecting, but let's see if I understand what it means. This means that if we put a current into one end of the inductor, it'll take about 40 ns for current to reach the other end, right? So we should expect a phase delay in the current of 180 degrees at 6.15 MHz, or about 30 degrees at 1 MHz, from one end to the other? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote: Richard Harrison wrote: The velocity of the EM wave traveling around the turns of the coil is almost equal to the velocity in a straight wire. But, the time required to travel 471 inches is 40 times the time required to travel 12 inches. The velocity factor is the reciprocal of 40 or 0.025. Not quite what I was expecting, but let's see if I understand what it means. This means that if we put a current into one end of the inductor, it'll take about 40 ns for current to reach the other end, right? So we should expect a phase delay in the current of 180 degrees at 6.15 MHz, or about 30 degrees at 1 MHz, from one end to the other? Dr. Corum's VF equation predicts a VF of approximately double Richard's with corresponding delays of 1/2 of your calculated values. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"Dr. Corum`s VF equation predicts a VF of approximately double Richard`s----." I wonder why? Dr. Terman wrote that the wave follows the turns in a coil. My recollection of common solid-dielectric coax VF is about 2/3 that of free-space due to the fense plastic. Twice the velocity factor in a coil requires a wave traveling faster than light or taking a short-cut around the turns. I often learn from my mistakes. Where did I err? Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote: Twice the velocity factor in a coil requires a wave traveling faster than light or taking a short-cut around the turns. I often learn from my mistakes. Where did I err? The current does take a short-cut due to adjacent coil coupling. But please note the velocity factor only approximately doubles from the "round and round the coil" calculation. Even though a VF of 0.04 is ~double the "round and round the coil" approximation, it is still 96% away from the VF=1.0 originally asserted by W8JI which assumes that all the coils couple 100% to all the other coils. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"The current does take a short-cut due to adjacent coil coupling." R.W.P. King wrote on page 81 of Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Wave Guides: "The electromagnetic field in the near zone is characterized by an inverse-square law for amplitude and by quasi-instantaneous action." I still don`t know what to make of King`s assertion regards instantaneous action. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "The current does take a short-cut due to adjacent coil coupling." R.W.P. King wrote on page 81 of Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Wave Guides: "The electromagnetic field in the near zone is characterized by an inverse-square law for amplitude and by quasi-instantaneous action." I still don`t know what to make of King`s assertion regards instantaneous action. From the IEEE Dictionary: "instantaneous - A qualifying term indicating that no delay is purposely introduced in the action of the device." Does anyone have a formula for the coupling factor between turns in a coil? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going with Drs. Corum on this one. Solve equation 28 for tau, get
beta from equation 4. The phase velocity along the axis of the coil is omega/beta. The velocity factor in question is that phase velocity over the speed of light in a vacuum. The coil modes are surface waves in a weird coordinate system. Note that the paper is very explicit in saying they're not TEM. Throw equation 28 into Mathematica or Matlab or something and solve for tau. The cases given after equation 28 with all the limitations appear(ed?) to be a point of some contention, but equation 28 seems *only* to have the limitation of circumferential symmetry of the surface waves on the coil. At the junctions between the wire and the coil, there is a transfer of energy between the surface wave modes on the coil and the usual antenna mode (I guess it's TEM?) The coil is like G-line in that it guides surface waves, but the coil modes are modes specific to the helical geometry; the G-line surface waves are specific to the straight-wire geometry. There is a mode on the helix where the waves go round and round the turns, but the example given is a traveling wave tube for microwave amplification, and it seems to me that there are a few turns over a few inches for *microwave* frequencies. I am not one to argue with a solution to Maxwell's equations. -Dan |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, tau=sqrt(L*C); Z0=sqrt(L/C); L=3.86e-5; tau=4e-8
(Please note: That is NOT!! a lumped model!) implies that C= 41pF and Z0=965ohms (v.f. = 0.058 is left as an exercise for the reader.) But if the coil's axis is parallel to a ground plane, that 6" diameter coil must be spaced about a quarter inch away from the ground plane (axis 3.25" from ground plane) to get that 41pF capacitance, and that's assuming a solid tube 3" in radius as a quick model .(An approximation!) Cheers, Tom |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, you are allowing your imagination to stray.
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, W7EL wrote:
"This means that if we put a current into one end of the inductor, it`ll take about 40 ns for current to reach the other end, right? So we should expect a phase delay in current of 180 degrees at 6.15 MHz, from one end to another?" Hopper`s rule is one foot traveled per nanosecond. 40 feet of wire takes 40 nanoseconds. The wavelength of 6.15 MHz is 48,8 or about 160 feet and in that space the phase rotates 360-degrees. 40 feet is 1/4 of 360-degrees or 90-degrees at 6.15 MHz. At 1 MHz, the wavelength is 300 meters. 12,2 meters of wire is about 15-degrees of delay by my $1-dollar Chinese calculator. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |