Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom is correct in every respect, though he doesn't need me to confirm
this. It is fairly easy to show that the Trask transformer is electrically equivalent to the popular trifilar-wound 4:1 voltage balun when wound on a single toroidal core. As such, it has no output (I wound and measured one) into a fully unbalanced load, and of course it has no choking action at all. I do not know about binocular cores. It would seem the transformer works somewhat into an unbalanced load when built with these, maybe due to imperfect flux coupling between the two holes? I haven't measured one. And neither has Trask himself. Until he produces a true transfer function plot into a balanced and fully unbalanced load and a choking impedance plot we are left to guess. To use return loss plots to infer correct operation of a two-port network is, um, unusual. 73, Glenn AC7ZN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
FT857 mobile 80m tuner? | Equipment |