Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:14:24 -0600, jimbo wrote:
[snip] The ARRL Antenna Book has a small section on J-Pole antennas. They show both designs, conventional shorted stub and the uncommon end fed, open stub designs. They say that the shorted stub design should have a 4/1 balun at the feed point because a direct coax connection results in extreme sensitivity to near by objects. And they also say the end fed, open stub design doesn't require a balun and is much less sensitive to near by objects, but is harder to tune. (I don't understand that point, there is one less parameter to fiddle with.) All of this leads me to wonder why almost all J-Pole designs one sees are of the shorted stub version and almost none use a balun. I suspect ease of construction and low cost. My "store bought" Arrow end fed, open stub, J-Pole seems to verify the ARRL Antenna Book's conclusions about sensitivity to near by objects. However, do-it-yourself construction does appear to be much more difficult. I may give it a try, just out of curiosity. [snip] A j-pole (open or closed stub) will perform better with a common mode choke at the feed point. Even better, use two chokes. One at the feed point and the other 1/4-wave down the line. This will reduce the higher angle radiation that results from the feed line being part of the antenna. Using a choke on ANY antenna fed with coax is just good engineering practice. It can't hurt - only help. A few turns of coax costs very little. 73, Danny, K6MHE In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress. - John Adams email: k6mheatarrldotnet http://www.k6mhe.com/ |