Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob" wrote in message . com... The J-pole crowd seems to tout fantastic claims about this antenna and I have never been impressed. Many people have tested the J-pole against other easy to make antennas and the end fed half wave J-pole usually does not stand up to even it’s brother, the center fed half wave dipole. I assume the decrease in performance is due to mistakes in assembling and tuning the matching section. Here is a link to a group that tested some J-poles against other antennas in the CA desert and the J-pole lost to even simple 1/4 wave ground plane types. http://www.geocities.com/SiliconVall...5/anttest.html snip A quick look at the numbers doesn't make the j-pole look so all-fired bad. "Losing" by 1 dB or so isn't a serious loss. Ham radio isn't exactly the Kentucky Derby. I don't know what "fantastic claims" you've heard, but my affinity for the j-pole comes from its simplicity and durability. It's a halfwave vertical that requires no ground plane and can often be matched to 1:1 at the sweet spot. Mounting is a dream -- it even works if you drop the low end into a plumbing vent pipe. (How would I know that? ;-) I have never built a center-fed halfwave, but we use a bunch of them in the Navy -- call them "stovepipes" because of the way the fiberglass housings look -- and they work very, very well. The elements are large metal cylinders, tending to make them quite broadband. I do not know how they're fed ... balun or what. John , KD6VKW |