Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dansawyeror wrote:
All, What is the best way to base impedance measurements, by voltage and current phase or by forward and reflected power? Measurement or calculation of forward and reverse power don't give you enough information to determine impedance. There are an infinite number of impedances which result in any given set of forward and reverse powers. Likewise, voltage and current phase don't provide enough information. Again, there are an infinite number of impedances possible for any set of voltage and current phases. First I assume both methods provide the data to measure impedance. No, neither one does. Among adequate sets of measurements which will allow you to determine impedance are both magnitude and phase of both voltage and current; or the ratio of voltage and current and the difference between their phase angles; or the magnitude and angle of the reflection coefficient. It would seem that both suffer from the real effects of the taking the measurement. Measuring voltage suffers from the effects of the reflected signal, I would assume current does as well. Couplers have a built in cross talk parameter. It's much more difficult than most people realize to make accurate RF measurements. Any measurements have numerous potential sources of error. If you need accurate results, you should always measure a number of known impedances approximately equal to the measurement being questioned to verify that the system is sound. Measuring antennas brings the additional problems of coupling among the antenna, test equipment, and you; disturbances from other signals being received by the antenna; common mode currents; and properties of connecting feedlines. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |