Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
VK2KCE wrote:
Korbin, I have just done a heap of experimenting on 80m using a Terlin Outbacker "Outreach" mobile whip. I found that it made none or little difference when using 4 x 1/4 wavelength radials. I then used a 33 ft fibreglass extendable pole with a dipole attached, certainly and naturally it outperformed the mobile whip. I made up a full wave loop on 80m, slung it vertically between 2 large trees, and found it out performed the dipole, mainly because of the noise level was lower than either the mobile whip or the dipole. On receive the full wave loop was the best, followed by the inverted vee and lagging way behind was the mobile whip. my 2 cents worth. John "Korbin Dallas" wrote in message news:Uem7g.54594$Eh4.50096@trnddc01... : On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:33:51 +0930, OZUser wrote: : : As an avid 4WD SUV owner I do a lot of outback travelling (Austrlian : Deserts, Cape York, Kimberly Coast) and as such have a Barrett 950 HFradio : &Barrett 910 Autotune antenna installed for comms. : : Would it be preferable when camped / stationary to earth the vehile to a : "ground" ground = what I am looking for is a better receive signal ????? : : Switching to a Dipole antenna suspended from the trees would be a Major : step upward in performance. : : Mobile antennas have very low efficiency, grounding them will not improve : that significantly relative to the dipole. : : KD Throw the terlin away and you will gain 6db by using a decent mobile antenna, no joke. The thing is dummy load for dx. You would not say that about vertical mobile antennas if you screwed a 1/4 wave whip on your vehicle using the same ground Considering that people claim terlins to work when they tuner them to a 1:1 vswr is laughable really, with something like 40 ohms ground loss resistance! You could try a inverted L with a autotuner at the base if you wanted better efficiency. A 6 meter fishing pole with 6 meters of wire horizontal is a cracker antenna. Worst mobile antennas are those base loaded auto tuning antennas from codan and barret, they have a honest 12 db loss compared to a good monoband 20 meter centre loaded whip. When you antenna is short you better off using multiple very small radials than a few long ones. Just forget all the nonses and make a good centre fed doublet with open wire feedline and use it on all bands. No Better or cheaper antenna around. Yeah and forget those joke Dummy Load Antennas sold by Barret Codan and Bushcomm. They a heap of crap. Greg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ? | Shortwave | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
On Topic | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna |