Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
If it is the "ultimate reference" there is no need for multiple points of view. Everything contained in the ultimate reference will be complete, correct, and indisputable. Sorta like RRAA. 73, Gene W4SZ Cecil Moore wrote: Yuri Blanarovich wrote: I like the statement on the cover of ARRL Antenna Book: "The ULTIMATE reference for Amateur Radio antennas, transmission lines and propagation" But Yuri, shouldn't an "ULTIMATE reference" contain both sides of the issue? :-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |