LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old December 20th 03, 05:06 PM
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil,

If it is the "ultimate reference" there is no need for multiple points of view.
Everything contained in the ultimate reference will be complete, correct, and
indisputable.

Sorta like RRAA.

73,
Gene
W4SZ


Cecil Moore wrote:
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

I like the statement on the cover of ARRL Antenna Book: "The ULTIMATE
reference
for Amateur Radio antennas, transmission lines and propagation"



But Yuri, shouldn't an "ULTIMATE reference" contain both sides
of the issue? :-)


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 69 December 5th 03 02:11 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017