On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:36:41 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
I note you do NOT say "in exactly the same manner," which is
unsupportable in the literature.

"Exactly" is one of the buzz words like "perfect", "always",
"never", "infinite", "lossless", etc. that invariably make
any statement using them false.

Another motto we can all live by, except maybe its author who in so
many words:

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:35:14 GMT, in rec.radio.amateur.antenna you
wrote:
Exactly
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:42:12 GMT, in rec.radio.amateur.antenna you
wrote:
Exactly
exactly
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:13:52 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
Exactly
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:45:39 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:
Exactly
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:40:40 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:
always
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:34:51 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:
always
always
always
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:20:10 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:
always
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:04:02 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
never
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:01:18 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
never
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:35:14 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
never
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:20:19 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:
never
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:28:35 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
never

and on and on and on (luckily I only pick up 1/4 of all the effluent)
so much that I'm not inspired to quote the rest of these 5 forbidden
words when 3 peg the irony meter.

Nobody, except some "experts"
on this newsgroup, is ignorant enough to use those words in
a supposedly technical valid sentence.

You know why cowboys wear their jeans inside their boots? [hint is
found above]