Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: In a linear system, there only needs to be a straight line function between the input and output. The actual signals on the input wouldn't be very useful if only straight line functions were allowed on that input. The current distribution along an antenna element length only ever approximates a straight line. The only requirement for that current to obey the rules for a linear system is that it be a linear function of the source current and it is at every point. I mostly agree with your definition of linearity. Roy's point that an offset in the straight line violates superposition is an example of a straight line violating superposition. Also consider the throwing of two dice. If the dice act independently they can be considered a linear system with two outputs (the numbers that show on the dice) which obeys the law of superposition. If, however, the dice collide when thrown, they now influence each other, the system becomes nonlinear, and the law of superposition is violated. It's pretty hard for me to attach a straight line function to dice. Mixers are especially interesting beasts when viewed in the light of superposition. They are obviously highly nonlinear, yet we regularly speak of mixer linearity. Here is the trick: when the local oscillator is included in the input signal set, the mixer is highly nonlinear as the LO influences every signal that comes in drastically, in the sense of generating new frequencies. But it is convenient to think of the local oscillator as just an internal parameter of the mixer, and to not include it in the input signal set. Under this assumption all the RF input signals substantially obey the law of superposition (that is, they do not influence each other) and discussing mixer linearity has enough meaning that we can characterize it through standard tests. Note also that under this assumption the output frequencies do not match the input frequencies in general, yet the law of superposition holds over a wide dynamic range. Cecil's point that doubling antenna current will double the current at each point in the antenna (I'm rephrasing) has a dual in mixers: doubling any signal will double all the mixer's ouputs due to that signal alone, and not any other outputs. 73, Glenn Dixon AC7ZN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Steveo Fight Checklist | CB | |||
Steveo/Race Worrier Fight Schedule so far | CB |