Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Harrison wrote: Yuri is consistent with Terman, and that is liable to be better than a bible because it is provable and demands no faith. If wrong, it will be rewritten with corrections. If you read what has been said here very carefully you will find Yuri claims the shield "blocks electric fields" or stops "electrostatic fields". This is the effect of a Faraday cage or shield. I did not claim that effect. Terman certainly did not. It is a folklore or Ham-myth that only appears in amateur circles. What others (including Terman exactly as you quoted) are trying to tell Yuri is the shield ONLY affects balance. The shield IS the actual antenna element that does the radiating. That is written in a half dozen engineering good engineering references. That is how ANY shield behaves. Read he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage or he http://members.aol.com/omlcgm/deteck...gy/faraday.htm or any of dozens of other places. Unless an off-the-wall hobbyist publication or rouge opinion, you will see everyone agrees. What Terman said is absolutely correct. The "shield" (when properly constructed) balances the capacitance of the antenna to earth. It does not "stop" the electric field. It certainly does not filter a time-varying electric field because doing so would by definition of Maxwell's equations (which everyone who isn't a CFA or EH antenna quack agrees are true) also stop the time varying magnetic field. As everyone (including Terman) has tried to explain, the shield only affects balance. The shield HAS to be the actual antenna element because by definition of ALL the peer-reviewed textbooks published to date as well as any description of coaxial cables the inner shield wall is isolated from the outside by the skin depth of that wall. This is so very simple to prove, it only takes a moment. It doesn't even take exotic test gear. These experiments were done in the 18th century with very crude instruments. You can take a solid copper sheet for example and place a small loop antenna near that "wall". If you probe current on the wall near the loop on the loop side, you will find a current maximum right under that loop. VERY easy to see. 100% repeatable. Now if you move the probe to the other side of the wall you will find current MINIMUM at the sheet center and increasing towards two of the edges. This is a TOTALLY open wall with no seal, it isn't even a box. Shields a few skin depths thick are a virtually perfect barrier to both magnetic and electric fields. This is true for densely woven coaxial cable shield or even thin aluminum shields, metallic sheets, or any good conductive wall. Saying Terman supports anything to the contrary only proves someone is misquoting or misunderstanding plain English, since Terman is a very clear writer. There is no way Terman failed basic physics and his peer reviewed textbooks are wrong. Yuri may need to read some basic textbooks, I'd be happy to copy the applicable pages if there isn't a good library nearby. It is essential to get the basics down solid. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! | Antenna | |||
Steveo Fight Checklist | CB | |||
Steveo/Race Worrier Fight Schedule so far | CB |