Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:34:08 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote: |Let's go a little slowly here. It is not clear where the reading is |taking place. He states 'if I put a cap across the coax'. Where is the |reading? Across the coax or at the antenna? The reading is where the coax connected to the MFJ thingie. Beats me as to where that was. But I don't care whether the reading was at the antenna, the middle of the coax or the transmitter end. *Wherever* he took the reading is the *load* as far as I'm concerned and that's where he needs to insert the -j35 series reactance to cancel the +j35. If he makes a measurement elsewhere and gets a different answer, then he needs a different solution. | |He should make the reading at the antenna terminals and add compensation |there so that the VSWR changes from 2.1:1 to approximately 1:1. If the terminals are 100' in the air, in between two supports, that might be difficult. But in principle I agree the best place to do the matching is at the antenna. But when I say this, all of the guys using ladder line with 50:1 SWRs get all upset. | |I don't have a problem with a 2.1:1 VSWR. I'd leave it alone or retrim |the antenna. Yep. The old Drake L-4B "antenna tuner" easily handles this. | | |W1MCE |+ + + | |Wes Stewart wrote: | | On 20 Dec 2003 23:00:17 GMT, (PDRUNEN) wrote: | | |Hi Group, | | | |A friend of mine let me borrow one of those MFJ antenna analizier with the | |reads out of the R and X component. | | | |Now if I have a reading of 40 R and 35 X then if I put a cap across the coax | |with an impedance of 35 ohm it should cancel out the inductive reactance and I | |should only see the 40 ohm resistive? | | No. The reading you have is an impedance. Impedances are given in | series form. If you shunt this with -j35, you should read 30.6 -j35 | | | If you want to tune out the reactance, put your -j35 capacitor in | series with the load. | |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes, prior to my change of QTH from Massachusetts to New Hampshire I was
one of those guys using a center fed doublet with tuned 600 ohm feeders and 40:1 VSWRs. I don't have any problem with non resonant antennas and/or high VSWR! Just manage the losses at a level you are comfortable with. I also posted that I would not be concerned with a 40 +/- j35 load [VSWR = 2.1:1]. If it causes the original poster problems then I stated 'trim' the antenna. Or, add/subtract feedline to eliminate the reactive component. Or, use a transmission line stub to both eliminate the reactive component and achieve a 1:1 VSWR. There are lots of methods to get to 1:1, but I believe it is not necessary. DD, W1MCE + + + Wes Stewart wrote: But in principle I agree the best place to do the matching is at the antenna. But when I say this, all of the guys using ladder line with 50:1 SWRs get all upset. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna |