| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cec, there you go again, quoting the bibles!
If the F2 is present then it must be daylight. And if its daylight then the E-Layer must also be present. For a groundpath distance of 400 miles the most likely reflector is the E-Layer. In daylight the E-Layer is an excellent, stable reflector. Furthermore, the radio path distance is considerably shorter than via the higher F1 or F2-Layers. The height of the E-Layer is about 70 miles. Assuming a flat Earth, the elevation angle is - ArcTan(70/200) = 19 degrees. It depends to some extent on the E-Layer critical frequency and the MUF. If the MUF is low enough and the transmit frequency is high enough, e.g., 14 or 21 MHz, then the wave may pass right through the E-Layer and be reflected most likely by the F1-Layer at a height of roughly 300 miles. Signals received via the F-Layers, if received at all, will be weaker than via the E-Layer, if only because the path length is greater. The elevation angle via the F1-Layer will be about - ArcTan(300/200) = 56 degrees. At night the E and F2 layers disappear. There remains only the nighttime F at a height of about 200 miles to give an elevation angle of 45 degrees. That is, of course, if the nighttime-F critical frequency and MUF allows propagation. There are such things as skip distances. ( Roy, no, I havn't made arrangements with high power broadcasters at known distances to make tests to prove the foregoing predictions. And yes, I know it's refraction and not reflection.) ---- Reg, G4FGQ. ======================================== "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . net... Ken Bessler wrote: Lets assume a single hop 40m signal from 400 miles away. What elevation angle does it arrive at? Both stations are using inverted V's at nominal height. There are no large bodies of water in between. Daytime and/or nighttime. That chart is in the ARRL Antenna Book. Assuming F2 layer reflection, the arriving angle is reported to be in excess of 50 degrees. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal | Homebrew | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
| signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||