Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Kåre Hellan wrote:
Roy Lewallen writes: bob wrote: I dont have NEC4 is it too much to ask you to run the model. Radials over sea water versus a direct connection? Sure. How many, how high, and how long? The foot-long wire produces efficiency of virtually unmeasurably close to 100%. So radials can't be significantly better. What sort of efficiency are you expecting from the radials? How does a copper wire behave when submerged in salt water? Won't it corrode rapidly, so that you don't get a metal to salt water connection, but a capacitive coupling across copper oxide? Not a rhetorical question, btw. I really don't know the answer. 73 LA4RT Jon The copper alloys widely used in wires are quite resistant to corrosion. Even when immersed in pure seawater, their corrosion rate there is on the order of 0.025 mm/year. Unfortunately polluted waters can increase that rate. The metal to water interface may indeed be affected by the corrosion layer. This problem is frequently seen by electricians when installing grounding rods in the earth. However, I imagine the capacitance in this case would provide sufficient coupling at RF so that it would not be a problem. Biofouling might be of greater concern if corrosion does not occur fast enough. 73, Chuck NT3G ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Grounds | Shortwave | |||
Base Antenna Mounting | CB | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |