Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote Yep, you don't have to mess with those pesky reflections when the line is terminated in a load equal to its characteristic impedance. Then the problem reduces to the trivial one you've posed. Simple problem, simple solution. ======================================= As I say, I've lost the original question. But if a steady-state answer is needed for the original question then the answer can be found by the same simple means without the unnecessary complication of reflections. It's the Devil which makes Cecil pose such loaded questions. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
brainteaser exercise | Antenna |