Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you ask "why" deeply enough, we'll get to a point where we have to
say, "Because that's just the way it is." But a bit more explanation to what Reg wrote... If the loop is balanced and oriented properly, the voltages induced by the electric field will be equal amplitude and the same polarity, or very nearly so, and cancel out at the feedpoint, but the EMF induced in the loop by the magnetic component of the electromagnetic field will be there in full force. Look up "Faraday's Law of Magnetic Induction." One advantage of a small loop at low frequencies is that local "noise" sources are commonly predominantly electric-field...they have not fully developed at that distance into electromagnetic fields, and boundary conditions constrain them to be predominantly vertical near the ground, so if the loop is properly balanced and oriented in that field, it can reject much of the local "electrical" noise. There are also possibilities for using the directional "nulls" of the loop to find the direction of an incoming signal, if the loop is small, and there are advantages there, too, in having it respond to the magnetic component only. You can find more complete explanations in antenna books...for instance, King, Mimno and Wing, "Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides." Cheers, Tom (dclapp) wrote in message . com... I've read that loop receiving antennas capture more of the magnetic field -- and less of the electrical field (true?) -- than other forms of antennas. Why is that?? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The way Tom tells us is a good way to tell it.
And for those who wonder are there any on the market? There will be one soon . See URL : http://home.hetnet.nl/~maartenmiriam/index.html For a full colour brochure, drop me an email. Maarten "Tom Bruhns" wrote in message m... If you ask "why" deeply enough, we'll get to a point where we have to say, "Because that's just the way it is." But a bit more explanation to what Reg wrote... If the loop is balanced and oriented properly, the voltages induced by the electric field will be equal amplitude and the same polarity, or very nearly so, and cancel out at the feedpoint, but the EMF induced in the loop by the magnetic component of the electromagnetic field will be there in full force. Look up "Faraday's Law of Magnetic Induction." One advantage of a small loop at low frequencies is that local "noise" sources are commonly predominantly electric-field...they have not fully developed at that distance into electromagnetic fields, and boundary conditions constrain them to be predominantly vertical near the ground, so if the loop is properly balanced and oriented in that field, it can reject much of the local "electrical" noise. There are also possibilities for using the directional "nulls" of the loop to find the direction of an incoming signal, if the loop is small, and there are advantages there, too, in having it respond to the magnetic component only. You can find more complete explanations in antenna books...for instance, King, Mimno and Wing, "Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides." Cheers, Tom (dclapp) wrote in message . com... I've read that loop receiving antennas capture more of the magnetic field -- and less of the electrical field (true?) -- than other forms of antennas. Why is that?? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DIDNT SEE ANYTHING IN SPRING 2003 so I thought the product was vaporware. I
am a prospect, but I am a SWL and dont need & wont pay for a product set up for transmitters The Wellbrook LA5030 is on my wish list but I don't think it's in my budget. Notice how cleverly they avoid stating COST? ============================= "Maarten Hagg" wrote in message ... The way Tom tells us is a good way to tell it. And for those who wonder are there any on the market? There will be one soon . See URL : http://home.hetnet.nl/~maartenmiriam/index.html For a full colour brochure, drop me an email. Maarten |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe Strain" wrote:
DIDNT SEE ANYTHING IN SPRING 2003 so I thought the product was vaporware. I am a prospect, but I am a SWL and dont need & wont pay for a product set up for transmitters You might want to look at my 2-part series on active receiving loop antennas that appeared in QEX earlier this year. Chris ,----------------------. High Performance Mixers and / What's all this \ Amplifiers for RF Communications / extinct stuff, anyhow? / \ _______,--------------' Chris Trask / N7ZWY _ |/ Principal Engineer oo\ Sonoran Radio Research (__)\ _ P.O. Box 25240 \ \ .' `. Tempe, Arizona 85285-5240 \ \ / \ \ '" \ IEEE Member #40274515 . ( ) \ '-| )__| :. \ Email: | | | | \ '. http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask c__; c__; '-..'.__ Graphics by Loek Frederiks |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna |