Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Russ wrote:
Be careful of the power handling capabilities of thicknet coax removed from service. I'm not looking to run a kilowatt thru it. And I know that foam coax is less capable than solid coax. I'm only running 100W anyway. Be aware also that it has been in place for up to twenty-five years. You do know how thicknet is accessed don't you? A hole is drilled in the insulation and braid. A device called a "vampire tap" is then clamped around the cable. The tap has a probe that (sometimes!) contacts the center conductor. That can't be good for the characteristics of the cable when removed, or the weather-proofing either. I'm aware of vampire taps, and the cable I used had none. And the cable has been indoors all the time, and in good condition. I used to use it on 2m and it worked well for that. Stop being such a damn cheapskate and buy some good, new coax. Wouldn't be a true ham, then.... ;-) Russ, KF4WXD and CCNP 73s |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |