Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
"Ian White GM3SEK" wrote in message ... Those were the phased arrays for the earlier VHF radar, and consisted of two or four two-element yagis clustered around the nose (of a two-engined aircraft, obviously). This gave a fairly good forward-looking capability. Both sides did much the same, and given the relatively long wavelength, it's hard to think how better to do it. The huge benefit of the magnetron was that it operated at much shorter wavelengths, which frees up the antenna design and provides much better spatial resolution - witness the downward-looking "H2S" radar which was the magnetron's first major deployment. The VHF radars were still around into the late 1970's, maybe beyond. The US Navy had them on carriers for air search. I think the nomenclature was AN/SPS-29 and/or AN/SPS-37. The one I recall was in the 218 - 220 MHz and it was hell on TV channel 13! The antenna was referred to as a bedspring array; the rectangular framework for the dipole radiating elements resembled a giant bedspring. Sure, but none of those would fly very well. The discussion was really about airborne radar, where there are tough limits on antenna size. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in the early 70's I got a pair of magetron magnets that came out
of old airborne radio set - can't remember the nomenclature - that the USAF converted into a weather radio. They were quite large and strong, and 'U' shaped. Someone swiped them in a move. Anybody know where I might find a set? Google and eBay haven't turned up anything. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian, GM3SEK wrote:
"Sure, but none of those (bedapring antenna arrays) would fly very well." It`s been a long time now but I believe investigation showed the army`s new radar (earthborne) got good echos from the approaching Japanese arircraft on December 7, 1941, but the top brass rejected the reports in disbelief of either the new equipment or the audacity of the Japanese Navy. That attack changed naval warfare forever. Lot more respect for both aircraft and radar ever since. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Harrison wrote: Ian, GM3SEK wrote: "Sure, but none of those (bedapring antenna arrays) would fly very well." It`s been a long time now but I believe investigation showed the army`s new radar (earthborne) got good echos from the approaching Japanese arircraft on December 7, 1941, but the top brass rejected the reports in disbelief of either the new equipment or the audacity of the Japanese Navy. That attack changed naval warfare forever. Lot more respect for both aircraft and radar ever since. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI as I understand the Matter the radar sighting never made past a LT to the top brass that one of the problem that day was the still pecetime armed forces were quick to discount anything with the number of "false sighting" etc |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2J22 Magnetron | Swap | |||
2J22 Magnetron | Swap | |||
The Cavity Magnetron. | Antenna | |||
Radio Origins in the US | Shortwave | |||
help identify: Varian VMC-1680 (5.5 GHz oscillator; Magnetron? Klystron?) | Homebrew |