Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There seems to be a number of commercial antennas
described as H-field antennas intended for LORAN application. Most claim improved immunity to precipitation static. Is there a theoretical basis for such claims? Yes. It increases sales just like zoom zoom zoom in car advertisements. Seriously, precipitation static is caused by corna discharge from an antenna or object someplace near the antenna. The radiated field from that leakage current can be almost any field impedance and will always be a mixture of time-varying electric and magnetic fields. What a small loop actually buys you is a compact antenna that has no sharp protruding edges, and that decreases the chances of having corona right from the antenna. A whip would have a sharp protruding point, and that would encourge corona discharge and the resulting noise we call "precipitation static". Other than that, there is no advantage. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Is magnetic field affected by metal conductor? | Homebrew | |||
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) | Swap | |||
FA Motorola VHF rubber duck Antennas $4.99 ea. Dealer cost $8.70 List $11.80 | Swap | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna |