Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a quote from Kraus' "Antennas For All Applications"
3rd Edition, page 177, section 6-4: "The Thin Linear Antenna - In this section expressions for the far-field patterns of thin linear antennas will be developed. It is assumed that the antennas are symmetrically fed at the center by a balanced two-wire transmission line. The antennas may be of any length, but it is assumed that the current distribution is SINUSOIDAL. Current-distribution measurements indicate that this is a GOOD ASSUMPTION provided that the antenna is thin, i.e., when the conductor diameter is less than, say, lamda/100. Thus, the sinusoidal current distribution approximates the natural distribution on thin antennas." Emphasis mine. So Kraus gives us permission to treat the currents on a dipole as sinusoidal as long as the diameter of the element is less than 4 inches on 30 MHz or less than 40 inches on 3 MHz. So virtually all HF dipoles are thin-wire antennas. And since the current distribution is assumed sinusoidal, the arc-cosine function will yield the number of degrees a point is away from a current maximum point, e.g. the phase information for the forward traveling wave. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message .com... Here's a quote from Kraus' "Antennas For All Applications" 3rd Edition, page 177, section 6-4: "The Thin Linear Antenna - In this section expressions for the far-field patterns of thin linear antennas will be developed. It is assumed that the antennas are symmetrically fed at the center by a balanced two-wire transmission line. The antennas may be of any length, but it is assumed that the current distribution is SINUSOIDAL. Current-distribution measurements indicate that this is a GOOD ASSUMPTION provided that the antenna is thin, i.e., when the conductor diameter is less than, say, lamda/100. Thus, the sinusoidal current distribution approximates the natural distribution on thin antennas." Emphasis mine. So Kraus gives us permission to treat the currents on a dipole as sinusoidal as long as the diameter of the element is less than 4 inches on 30 MHz or less than 40 inches on 3 MHz. So virtually all HF dipoles are thin-wire antennas. And since the current distribution is assumed sinusoidal, the arc-cosine function will yield the number of degrees a point is away from a current maximum point, e.g. the phase information for the forward traveling wave. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp i believe in this description he is refering to the current distribution of the standing wave. that is, the classical sine curve that shows a maximum at the feedpoint of the 1/2 wave dipole and zeros at the ends. in this case the shape of the curve is a function of the sin or cos of the distance from the feedpoint divided by the leg length times pi/2 or 90 degrees, which ever you prefer. however, that is not the phase of the forward traveling wave, that is the envelope of the sum of the forward and reverse waves... or the standing wave. the phase of a traveling wave is added to the omega*t value in the sin(wt+p) representation, but in a distributed system must be referenced not only to a time but also the location. or in simpler terms you can reference it to the time that the current crosses zero at a given point in the forward traveling wave. to get rid of the time dependence you must add the foward and reflected waves to get the standing wave, then you can make the classical sunusoidal dipole current plot. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
i believe in this description he is refering to the current distribution of the standing wave. that is, the classical sine curve that shows a maximum at the feedpoint of the 1/2 wave dipole and zeros at the ends. in this case the shape of the curve is a function of the sin or cos of the distance from the feedpoint divided by the leg length times pi/2 or 90 degrees, which ever you prefer. Exactly, and that is the number of degrees by which the forward traveling wave lags the source wave and therefore is the phase angle of the forward traveling wave reference to the source wave. however, that is not the phase of the forward traveling wave, ... Of course it is, referenced to a source phase angle of zero. Assuming the source phase reference is zero degrees, the phase of the forward traveling wave is related to the distance from the source (modified by the velocity factor). That's just simple physics. Given the source current is 1.0 amps at zero degrees, the standing wave current 1/2 way to the end of the antenna element will be 0.707 amps at zero degrees. Arc-cos(0.707) = -45 degrees. That's the phase angle of the forward current at that point since it lags the source current. Hint: There are very close to 90 degrees of antenna between the source and the end of a 1/2WL dipole since it is 1/4 wavelength. Remember 360/4 = 90 degrees. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Idine Ghoreishian -by- Idine Ghoreishian { The SPGC Antenna by RHF } | Shortwave | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave |